Re: CURRENT: FreeBSD not reporting AES-NI on Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v3

From: O. Hartmann <ohartmann_at_walstatt.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 18:31:11 +0100
Am Fri, 17 Mar 2017 20:07:35 +0300
Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw_at_zxy.spb.ru> schrieb:

> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 05:53:24PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> 
> > Am Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:04:29 +0300
> > Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw_at_zxy.spb.ru> schrieb:
> >   
> > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 12:36:25PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Running recent CURRENT on a Fujitsu Celsius M740 equipted with an Intel(R)
> > > > Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v3 _at_ 3.50GHz CPU makes me some trouble.
> > > > 
> > > > FreeBSD does not report the existence or availability of AES-NI feature, which
> > > > is supposed to be a feature of this type of CPU:    
> > > 
> > > What reassons to detect AES-NI by FreeBSD?  
> > 
> > What do you mean? I do not understand! FreeBSD is supposed to read the CPUID and
> > therefore the capabilities as every other OS, too. But there may some circumstances
> > why FBSD won't. I do not know, that is the reason why I'm asking here.  
> 
> This sample can have disabled AES-NI by vendor, in BIOS, for example.
> As I show by links this is posible.
> 
> CPUID in you example don't show AES-NI capabilities, for example
> 1650v4 w/ AES-NI
> 
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 _at_ 3.60GHz (3600.07-MHz K8-class CPU)
>   Origin="GenuineIntel"  Id=0x406f1  Family=0x6  Model=0x4f  Stepping=1
>   Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE>
>   Features2=0x7ffefbff<SSE3,PCLMULQDQ,DTES64,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,SMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,DCA,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,TSCDLT,AESNI,XSAVE,OSXSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND>
>                                                                                                                                                        ^^^^^^
>   AMD Features=0x2c100800<SYSCALL,NX,Page1GB,RDTSCP,LM>
>   AMD Features2=0x121<LAHF,ABM,Prefetch>
>   Structured Extended
> Features=0x21cbfbb<FSGSBASE,TSCADJ,BMI1,HLE,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,RTM,PQM,NFPUSG,PQE,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,PROCTRACE>
> XSAVE Features=0x1<XSAVEOPT> VT-x: PAT,HLT,MTF,PAUSE,EPT,UG,VPID,VID,PostIntr
>   TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics
> 
> In you sample: "TSCDLT,XSAVE"
> 
> May be AES-NI disabled by vendor and FreeBSD correct show this. Or some bug in FreeBSD,
> AES-NI work and other OS show AES-NI capabilities.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"

We have some LGA1151 XEON based 19 inch rack server, also equipted with Haswell
E3-12XX-v3 XEONs and FreeBSD, also CURRENT, does show AES-NI.

You're right, the vendor could have disabled AES-NI by intention - but they offered this
box especially with AES-NI capabilities. 

See here:

  http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/r285947-broken-AESNI-support-No-aesni0-on-Intel-XEON-E5-1650-v3-on-Fujitsu-Celsius-M740-td6028895.html

I feel a bit pissed off right now due to Fujitsu, because we started testing some
encrypting features and I'd like to use AES-NI and I run into this issue again.

I need to know that FreeBSD is not the issue with this specific CPU type. I'm still
frustrated by that stupid comment "UNIX is not supoorted" I got that time then when I
reported 2015 the issue to Fujitsu.

-- 
O. Hartmann

Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder Übermittlung meiner Daten für
Werbezwecke oder für die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (§ 28 Abs. 4 BDSG).

Received on Fri Mar 17 2017 - 16:31:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:10 UTC