Re: ino64? r318606 -> r318739 OK; r318739 -> r318781 fails SIGSEGV

From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 17:16:38 +0300
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 06:59:05AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:35:58PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > If build of r318739 succed, can you try, please, to rebuild the current
> > latest sources, but now with reverted r318750 ?
> 
> It did complete successfully.
> 
> I have updated /usr/src back to 318781, then started a new build.
So are you building stock 318781, or did you reverted r318750 ?

> 
> While it has not yet completed ">>> stage 4.2: building libraries", it
> is well beyond the provious point of failure (again, building parts of
> clang/libllvm).
> 
> I'm reporting now, as I'll need to head in to work fairly soon.  I
> should be able to report definitively a bit later.
Received on Wed May 24 2017 - 12:16:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:11 UTC