Re: ino64? r318606 -> r318739 OK; r318739 -> r318781 fails SIGSEGV

From: David Wolfskill <david_at_catwhisker.org>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 07:20:01 -0700
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 05:16:38PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 06:59:05AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:35:58PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > If build of r318739 succed, can you try, please, to rebuild the current
> > > latest sources, but now with reverted r318750 ?
> > 
> > It did complete successfully.
> > 
> > I have updated /usr/src back to 318781, then started a new build.
> So are you building stock 318781, or did you reverted r318750 ?

Stock 318781 [*].  I revert as a (nearly) last resort. :-)

> > While it has not yet completed ">>> stage 4.2: building libraries", it
> > is well beyond the provious point of failure (again, building parts of
> > clang/libllvm).
> > 
> > I'm reporting now, as I'll need to head in to work fairly soon.  I
> > should be able to report definitively a bit later.

It's completed the ">>> stage 4.2: building libraries" part, and well
into ">>> stage 4.3: building everything".

* Save for my (usual) hacking of conf/newvers.sh a bit.

And now I really do need to head in to work.

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill				david_at_catwhisker.org
"[T]he president’s improper efforts to influence an ongoing investigation"

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.

Received on Wed May 24 2017 - 12:20:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:11 UTC