Re: Head build unsafe for /etc today

From: Rodney W. Grimes <freebsd-rwg_at_pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2017 10:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
> On 11/2/2017 8:58 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> > FreeBSD has grown too big to test every possible thing before you commit.

I would say that it has always been too big to test every possible
thing before a commit.  Breakage is just going to happen, we make
great efforts to minimize it, but like all risks sooner or later
your gona have a failure.

> 
> The build itself is massive.  I usually forget about release/ and the
> new 'make packages', external toolchain, "old style" kernel builds, etc.
Good starting list for "make build-regresion" ?

> 
> Steve's concerns have validity.   I do think it's time we have an
> automated suite to test most build cases for things like bmake upgrades
> or other high risk changes like META_MODE.
> 
> 
> I'll think about this and add to my list of things to implement.

I would even go so far as to say this may be what we should be
running in (a) Jenkins.  Or perhaps a deeper exp-run?

-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes_at_freebsd.org
Received on Sat Nov 04 2017 - 16:23:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:13 UTC