In message <201711041723.vA4HNANJ001399_at_pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>, "Rodney W. Gri mes" writes: > > On 11/2/2017 8:58 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > FreeBSD has grown too big to test every possible thing before you commit. > > I would say that it has always been too big to test every possible > thing before a commit. Breakage is just going to happen, we make > great efforts to minimize it, but like all risks sooner or later > your gona have a failure. > > > > > The build itself is massive. I usually forget about release/ and the > > new 'make packages', external toolchain, "old style" kernel builds, etc. > Good starting list for "make build-regresion" ? > > > > > Steve's concerns have validity. I do think it's time we have an > > automated suite to test most build cases for things like bmake upgrades > > or other high risk changes like META_MODE. > > > > > > I'll think about this and add to my list of things to implement. > > I would even go so far as to say this may be what we should be > running in (a) Jenkins. Or perhaps a deeper exp-run? Yes. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy_at_FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.Received on Sat Nov 04 2017 - 21:51:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:13 UTC