Am 23.12.18 um 02:39 schrieb Montgomery-Smith, Stephen: > On 12/21/18 10:03 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >>> The port Makefile that I have prepared is attached below for reference. >>> Regards, STefan >> >> Thanks Stefan, >> I took current /usr/ports/misc/ctm/ >> & converted Stephen's & my diffs to be automatic ports patches: >> http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/misc/ctm/files/ >> http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/misc/ctm/README.JHS >> >> Stephens diffs are essential, without them CTM broke long ago, >> (5 digit numeric names maybe ?) >> >> I haven't checked all execution as my ctm_rmail scripts run >> automaticaly on an older release, not my current box, but this is >> running OK so far: >> ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.07000xEmpty.xz ; >> ctm -q /pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/svn-cur/svn-cur.07[0-9][0-9][0-9].xz >> >> Stephen may be best person to test delta builds, as hes the delta originator. >> >> Soonish I'll set up a >> [freebsd-]ctm-src-12 on http://mailman.berklix.org/mailman/listinfo >> if Stephens' & my requests to postmaster _at_ & mailman _at_ freebsd.org >> continues to get no response. > > Thank you for doing this, Stefan. The additional patches mentioned by > Julian need to be included with the port before it can work and be > tested. They are absolutely needed for the svn ctm deltas. Hi Stephen and Julian, I have converted the diffs into port patches (make makepatch) and updated the man-page revision dates of ctm.8 and ctm_rmail.8. The port update has been committed as r488168. I hope this brings the port to the level required to make the CTM port usable again. The patches could be imported to the Github repo (freebsd/ctm) after testing, but for now the patched port should suffice ... Best regards, STefanReceived on Sun Dec 23 2018 - 06:27:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:19 UTC