On 18/02/2018 15:26, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > My only point is that it is a performance improvement. IMHO that's enough :) I don't think that passing an invalid argument to a documented KPI is "enough" for any optimization. > If you can't suggest a more elegant way of doing that improvement, then all > I can suggest is to document it and add its support to ZFS. In return I can only suggest that (1) you run your suggestion by arch_at_ -- unless that's already been done and you can point me to the discussion, (2) document it and (3) double-check that all implementations confirm to it. -- Andriy GaponReceived on Sun Feb 18 2018 - 19:15:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:15 UTC