On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:15:24PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: A> On 18/02/2018 15:26, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: A> > My only point is that it is a performance improvement. IMHO that's enough :) A> A> I don't think that passing an invalid argument to a documented KPI is "enough" A> for any optimization. I don't see a sense in making this KPI so sacred. This is something used internally in kernel, and not used outside. The KPI has changed several times in the past. A> > If you can't suggest a more elegant way of doing that improvement, then all A> > I can suggest is to document it and add its support to ZFS. A> A> In return I can only suggest that (1) you run your suggestion by arch_at_ -- unless A> that's already been done and you can point me to the discussion, (2) document A> it and (3) double-check that all implementations confirm to it. I can provide a patch for ZFS. -- Gleb SmirnoffReceived on Sun Feb 18 2018 - 19:34:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:15 UTC