On 30/01/2018 09:33, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 29 Jan 2018, at 20:56, Lev Serebryakov <lev_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> >> I have these lines in my nanobsd config: >> >> WITHOUT_CROSS_COMPILER=yes >> WITH_SYSTEM_COMPILER=yes >> WITHOUT_CLANG=yes >> WITHOUT_CLANG_EXTRAS=yes >> WITHOUT_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP=yes >> WITHOUT_BINUTILS=yes >> WITHOUT_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP=yes >> WITHOUT_ELFTOOLCHAIN=yes >> WITHOUT_ELFTOOLCHAIN_TOOLS=yes >> WITHOUT_ELFTOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP=yes >> WITHOUT_LLD=yes >> XCC=/usr/bin/cc >> XCXX=/usr/bin/c++ >> XCPP=/usr/bin/cpp >> XAS=/usr/bin/as >> XAR=/usr/bin/ar >> XLD=/usr/bin/ld >> XNM=/usr/bin/nm >> XOBJDUMP=/usr/bin/objdump >> XRANLIB=/usr/bin/ranlib >> XSTRINGS=/usr/bin/strings >> XSTRIPBIN=/usr/bin/strip >> COMPILER_TYPE=clang >> >> And it worked some time ago. But now "buildworld" with these setting >> build libllvm and other cross-tools anyway. >> >> Host and target are the same (amd64) and nanobsd sources are the same >> as sources used to build host system. >> >> How to disable llvm & clang build completely? > > I think you also need WITHOUT_LLD_BOOTSTRAP now, if you are building for > amd64 or aarch64. You may also (soon) need WITHOUT_LLD_IS_LD, there are plans to enable LLD by default. Looking at man src.conf on current, WITHOUT_CROSS_COMPILER enforces - WITHOUT_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP WITHOUT_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP WITHOUT_ELFTOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP WITHOUT_GCC_BOOTSTRAP I think WITHOUT_LLD_BOOTSTRAP might belong in that list. There is also a WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN which enforces - WITHOUT_BINUTILS WITHOUT_CLANG WITHOUT_CLANG_EXTRAS WITHOUT_CLANG_FULL WITHOUT_GCC WITHOUT_GDB WITHOUT_INCLUDES WITHOUT_LLD WITHOUT_LLDB which WITHOUT_LLD_IS_LD might also belong to, there is no mention of other options enforcing it. Shouldn't nanobsd disable these by default? -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane AmblerReceived on Tue Jan 30 2018 - 03:10:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:14 UTC