Re: [PATCH] Recent libm additions

From: Ian Lepore <ian_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2018 11:00:41 -0600
On Sun, 2018-07-15 at 08:06 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Apparently, the recents additions to libm were not
> subject to any code review.  The following patch 
> does two things.  First, it works around
> 
> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8532
> 
> Second, it removes the pollution of libm with the
> polevll.c functions.  Those functions are used 
> only in ld80/e_powl.c, and those functions should
> be inlined.
> 
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- Makefile	(revision 336304)
> +++ Makefile	(working copy)
> _at__at_ -56,7 +56,6 _at__at_
>  	imprecise.c \
>  	k_cos.c k_cosf.c k_exp.c k_expf.c k_rem_pio2.c k_sin.c k_sinf.c \
>  	k_tan.c k_tanf.c \
> -	polevll.c \
>  	s_asinh.c s_asinhf.c s_atan.c s_atanf.c s_carg.c s_cargf.c s_cargl.c \
>  	s_cbrt.c s_cbrtf.c s_ceil.c s_ceilf.c s_clog.c s_clogf.c \
>  	s_copysign.c s_copysignf.c s_cos.c s_cosf.c \
> Index: ld80/e_powl.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ld80/e_powl.c	(revision 336304)
> +++ ld80/e_powl.c	(working copy)
> _at__at_ -77,6 +77,7 _at__at_
>  #include 
>  
>  #include "math_private.h"
> +#include "polevll.c"
>  
>  /* Table size */
>  #define NXT 32
> Index: src/math_private.h
> ===================================================================
> --- src/math_private.h	(revision 336304)
> +++ src/math_private.h	(working copy)
> _at__at_ -828,7 +828,4 _at__at_
>  long double __kernel_cosl(long double, long double);
>  long double __kernel_tanl(long double, long double, int);
>  
> -long double __p1evll(long double, void *, int);
> -long double __polevll(long double, void *, int);
> -
>  #endif /* !_MATH_PRIVATE_H_ */
> Index: src/polevll.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src/polevll.c	(revision 336304)
> +++ src/polevll.c	(working copy)
> _at__at_ -69,7 +69,7 _at__at_
>   * Polynomial evaluator:
>   *  P[0] x^n  +  P[1] x^(n-1)  +  ...  +  P[n]
>   */
> -long double
> +static inline long double
>  __polevll(long double x, void *PP, int n)
>  {
>  	long double y;
> _at__at_ -88,7 +88,7 _at__at_
>   * Polynomial evaluator:
>   *  x^n  +  P[0] x^(n-1)  +  P[1] x^(n-2)  +  ...  +  P[n]
>   */
> -long double
> +static inline long double
>  __p1evll(long double x, void *PP, int n)
>  {
>  	long double y;
> Index: src/s_cpow.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src/s_cpow.c	(revision 336304)
> +++ src/s_cpow.c	(working copy)
> _at__at_ -60,7 +60,7 _at__at_
>  	y = cimag (z);
>  	absa = cabs (a);
>  	if (absa == 0.0) {
> -		return (0.0 + 0.0 * I);
> +		return (CMPLX(0.0, 0.0));
>  	}
>  	arga = carg (a);
>  	r = pow (absa, x);
> _at__at_ -69,6 +69,6 _at__at_
>  		r = r * exp (-y * arga);
>  		theta = theta + y * log (absa);
>  	}
> -	w = r * cos (theta) + (r * sin (theta)) * I;
> +	w = CMPLX(r * cos (theta),  r * sin (theta));
>  	return (w);
>  }
> Index: src/s_cpowf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src/s_cpowf.c	(revision 336304)
> +++ src/s_cpowf.c	(working copy)
> _at__at_ -59,7 +59,7 _at__at_
>  	y = cimagf(z);
>  	absa = cabsf (a);
>  	if (absa == 0.0f) {
> -		return (0.0f + 0.0f * I);
> +		return (CMPLXF(0.0f, 0.0f));
>  	}
>  	arga = cargf (a);
>  	r = powf (absa, x);
> _at__at_ -68,6 +68,6 _at__at_
>  		r = r * expf (-y * arga);
>  		theta = theta + y * logf (absa);
>  	}
> -	w = r * cosf (theta) + (r * sinf (theta)) * I;
> +	w = CMPLXF(r * cosf (theta), r * sinf (theta));
>  	return (w);
>  }
> Index: src/s_cpowl.c
> ===================================================================
> --- src/s_cpowl.c	(revision 336304)
> +++ src/s_cpowl.c	(working copy)
> _at__at_ -59,7 +59,7 _at__at_
>  	y = cimagl(z);
>  	absa = cabsl(a);
>  	if (absa == 0.0L) {
> -		return (0.0L + 0.0L * I);
> +		return (CMPLXL(0.0L, 0.0L));
>  	}
>  	arga = cargl(a);
>  	r = powl(absa, x);
> _at__at_ -68,6 +68,6 _at__at_
>  		r = r * expl(-y * arga);
>  		theta = theta + y * logl(absa);
>  	}
> -	w = r * cosl(theta) + (r * sinl(theta)) * I;
> +	w = CMPLXL(r * cosl(theta), r * sinl(theta));
>  	return (w);
>  }
> 

If a file contains inline function definitions and is intended only to
be included into another file and not compiled separately, shouldn't
its name be spelled polevll.h ?

-- Ian
Received on Sun Jul 15 2018 - 15:00:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:17 UTC