Am 13.10.18 um 01:56 schrieb Don Lewis: > Prior to the OpenSSL 1.1.1 import, the base OpenSSL library was > /usr/lib/libssl.so.8. The security/openssl port (1.0.2p) installed > ${LOCALBASE}/lib/ilbssl.so.9 and the security/openssl-devel port > (1.1.0i) installed ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libssl.so.11. After the import, the > base OpenSSL library is /usr/lib/libssl.so.9. Now if you build ports > with DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl, the library that actually gets used > is ambiguous because there are now two different versions of libssl.so > (1.0.2p and 1.1.1) with the same shared library version number. > > I stumbled across this when debugging a virtualbox-ose configure > failure. The test executable was linked to the ports version of > libssl.so but rtld chose the base libssl.so at run time. I'm seeing something possibly related in pkg: $ ldd /usr/local/lib/libpkg. | grep ssl libpkg.a libpkg.so libpkg.so.4 libpkg.so.4.0.0 $ldd /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.4 | grep ssl libssl.so.9 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.9 (0x800679000) This results in: $ pkg -v ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.9: version OPENSSL_1_1_0 required by /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.4 not defined My work-around was to copy pkg-static over pkg (I have not checked whether the static version is linked against the system or ports version of the library, but I assume the latter). I have "DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=openssl" in make.conf but the same problem exists if pkg is built without that setting. My local version of portmaster has been changed to use pkg-static in favor of pkg and I plan to commit that change to the portmaster port, to make it resilient against this problem. Regards, STefanReceived on Sat Oct 13 2018 - 04:53:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:18 UTC