RE: ctm(1) deprecation in the FreeBSD base system?

And more importantly a great thanks for ctm from all of us who depended on
it for ages ;-) 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp
Sent: 22 October 2018 21:59
To: Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Cc: Rodney W. Grimes <freebsd-rwg_at_pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>; Ed Maste
<emaste_at_freebsd.org>; FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org>;
ctm-users_at_freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ctm(1) deprecation in the FreeBSD base system?

--------
In message
<CANCZdfrMfEZxjwZGQZA6qEbZOm=91GKa8xweZwSUs-+iTeUUTA_at_mail.gmail.com>
, Warner Losh writes:

>> > I think Julian Stacy is still running CTM generation ?
>>
>> Ah, yes, that brought back enough brain cells, confirmed that is who 
>> I saw with ctm usage.
>
>Do we need it in base? Or can we make it a port?

Absolutely make it a port!

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"