On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 20:25+0100, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 12:57-0500, Michael Butler wrote: > > > This member removal has other consequences. As follows .. > > > > --- lib/libprocstat__L --- > > Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/lib/libprocstat/smbfs.o > > --- libprocstat.o --- > > /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:29: error: no member named > > 'next' in 'struct vm_map_entry' > > for (entryp = map->header.next; > > ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ > > /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:622:24: error: no member named > > 'next' in 'struct vm_map_entry' > > entryp = vmentry.next) { > > ~~~~~~~ ^ > > 2 errors generated. > > Now we seem to be missing the prototypes: > > --- libprocstat.o --- > /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'vm_map_entry_first' is invalid in C99 > [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > for (entryp = vm_map_entry_first(map); > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:15: error: incompatible > integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'vm_map_entry_t' (aka > 'struct vm_map_entry *') from 'int' [-Werror,-Wint-conversion] > for (entryp = vm_map_entry_first(map); > ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:622:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'vm_map_entry_succ' is invalid in C99 > [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > entryp = vm_map_entry_succ(&vmentry)) { > ^ > /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:622:16: note: did you mean 'vm_map_entry_first'? > /usr/src/lib/libprocstat/libprocstat.c:620:17: note: 'vm_map_entry_first' declared here > > I'm at r355504. Now at r355506, and my laptop is building the kernels, one at a time. -- Trond.Received on Sat Dec 07 2019 - 20:03:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:22 UTC