Re: timed restoral until deleter makes a port

From: Warner Losh <imp_at_bsdimp.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:41:20 -0700
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Julian H. Stacey <jhs_at_berklix.com> wrote:

> Current box here is now about 10 seconds ahead, since timed was deleted,
> still waiting for the code vandal who removed timed from src/
> without proper discussion in advance, to move timed from src/ to ports/
>
> timed absence will bite more people when 13 is released.  timed
> should be restored to src/ until the code vandal is forced to write
> a ports/ entry.  Temporary removal of the src/ commit bit could encourage
> this & admonish irresponsible conduct.
>
> The tech issues have been discussed before, no need to repeat,
> this is just a question of enforcing responsible procedure.
>

The ball is in my court to approve a pull request so we can finish the
port. We have plenty of time before 13 and current, is after all, current.
So there's no need to do anything rash here.

I think all the rest of this is without merit and an overreaction.

Warner
Received on Thu Jan 24 2019 - 22:41:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:20 UTC