Re: timed restoral until deleter makes a port

> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Julian H. Stacey <jhs_at_berklix.com> wrote:
> 
> > Current box here is now about 10 seconds ahead, since timed was deleted,
> > still waiting for the code vandal who removed timed from src/
> > without proper discussion in advance, to move timed from src/ to ports/
> >
> > timed absence will bite more people when 13 is released.  timed
> > should be restored to src/ until the code vandal is forced to write
> > a ports/ entry.  Temporary removal of the src/ commit bit could encourage
> > this & admonish irresponsible conduct.
> >
> > The tech issues have been discussed before, no need to repeat,
> > this is just a question of enforcing responsible procedure.
> >
> 
> The ball is in my court to approve a pull request so we can finish the
> port. We have plenty of time before 13 and current, is after all, current.
> So there's no need to do anything rash here.
> 
> I think all the rest of this is without merit and an overreaction.

Lets prevent this in the future and make it formal policy that
if the solution to a removal from src is that a port be created
the order must be port created and working, then src de-orbit.

Agreeable?


-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes_at_freebsd.org