Re: timed restoral until deleter makes a port

From: Julian H. Stacey <jhs_at_berklix.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:23:26 +0100
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Julian H. Stacey <jhs_at_berklix.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Current box here is now about 10 seconds ahead, since timed was deleted,
> > > still waiting for the code vandal who removed timed from src/
> > > without proper discussion in advance, to move timed from src/ to ports/
> > >
> > > timed absence will bite more people when 13 is released.  timed
> > > should be restored to src/ until the code vandal is forced to write
> > > a ports/ entry.  Temporary removal of the src/ commit bit could encourage
> > > this & admonish irresponsible conduct.
> > >
> > > The tech issues have been discussed before, no need to repeat,
> > > this is just a question of enforcing responsible procedure.
> > >
> > 
> > The ball is in my court to approve a pull request so we can finish the
> > port. We have plenty of time before 13 and current, is after all, current.
> > So there's no need to do anything rash here.
> > 
> > I think all the rest of this is without merit and an overreaction.
> 
> Lets prevent this in the future and make it formal policy that
> if the solution to a removal from src is that a port be created
> the order must be port created and working, then src de-orbit.
> 
> Agreeable?

Sounds good. That's the way ctm is being handled.
PS if anyone wonders "Why Use CTM Instead of, or as well as SVN ?"
http://ctm.berklix.org

Cheers,
Julian
-- 
Julian Stacey, Consultant Systems Engineer, BSD Linux Unix, Munich Aachen Kent
 1st referendum Stole 700,000 votes from British in EU, 3.7 million globally,
 1.9 M too young to vote, 1.3 M died, mostly leavers.  Fraud, fines & lies.
 Honest Ref. Now !  Revoke Art. 50 for now to buy time to plan to avoid chaos.
                http://exitbrexit.uk/#email_your_mp
Received on Fri Jan 25 2019 - 08:24:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:20 UTC