Alan Somers wrote: >On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 6:38 PM Rick Macklem <rmacklem_at_uoguelph.ca> wrote: >> >> I have a little program for testing the copy_file_range(2) syscall I've been >> working on. (The current version is attached, in case anyone is interested.) >> >> It take a few minutes to run on a slow system and uses about 6Gbytes of disk >> space for the file system the output file is on. (It creates 2 files to use for testing. >> The first one is sparse and the second is copied from it, but grows as different byte >> ranges get copied, since "punching holes" is done via writes of 0 bytes.) >> >> My question is.. >> What needs to be done to include this in FreeBSD? >> I see some stuff under head/tests. I could probably figure out >> what the macros in those files are, but I can only see tests to see if >> arguments are valid and similar. As such, I'm not sure if this is the correct >> place for a test like this? >> >> Thanks for any help with this, rick > >head/tests is for complete automated tests, mostly in ATF format. >Your program sounds more like the kind of helper program that might be >more suitable for head/tools/regression. Those programs all require >some operator interaction. If you can automate your program then we >should add it to head/tests/sys. Does it really need 6GB to get >decent test coverage? Well, I wanted the input file to exceed 4Gb and to have a > 4Gb hole in it, to catch 32bit bugs (I test on i386). This did catch some problems during testing. Then, the program copies (random) ranges of the file to a second file. If the random copy is done over the "big hole" for the case where it hasn't truncated the output file (every second iteration), then it writes a "lot of 0s", growing the output file up to 6Gb of data. I could limit the "random" ranges to not copy the "big hole", but that would avoid testing that case. rickReceived on Fri Jul 05 2019 - 13:11:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:21 UTC