On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 4:12 AM Igor Mozolevsky <igor_at_hybrid-lab.co.uk> wrote: > This is a typical example of reframing a problem in one side's > favourable terms. Freedom of expression is a fundamental freedom as > recognised by the United Nations, and is guaranteed by the highest > courts of any civilised society. Attacking one's freedom of expression > under whatever auspices makes one an EXCEPTIONALLY terrible person > that should go and re-thing their life purpose! End of discussion. > I'd go a bit further and say its also every individuals right to be exposed to such things, and make judgements for themselves. The voices who are the most different deserve the most protection. Without these, any "freedom of speech" is illusion. One wonders where these advocates of censorship will turn when the tool they helped create is eventually turned back on them. -- AdamReceived on Sat May 18 2019 - 17:27:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:20 UTC