Hello, I thought I'd finally ask about these messages that appear on boot on my machine. It's a Lenovo A485, with an AMD Ryzen laptop running CURRENT as of 8 hours ago, in case that's relevant. Are some of these actionable/would it make sense to take a deeper look or are they about something needing further debugging with the "right" hardware? 1. "this should not happen": FTR: - I switched the wireless chip for an Intel AC 8265. - I'm used to having wireless be wlan0, so I rename iwm0 in rc.conf - This was connecting to a mobile hotspot, but I've seen the message on "normal" networks. And this is what I am seeing in /var/log/messages: Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: iwm0: <Intel(R) Dual Band Wireless AC 8265> mem 0xc0a00000-0xc0a01fff at device 0.0 on pci2 Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: iwm0: hw rev 0x230, fw ver 22.361476.0, address XX Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: wlan0: Ethernet address: XX Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: iwm0: frame 3/122 b800002c UNHANDLED (this should not happen) Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: iwm0: frame 4/192 b800002c UNHANDLED (this should not happen) Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: iwm0: frame 5/233 b800002c UNHANDLED (this should not happen) 2. There is also this "driver bug": Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: AMD-Vi: IVRS Info VAsize = 64 PAsize = 48 GVAsize = 2 flags:0 Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: driver bug: Unable to set devclass (class: ppc devname: (unknown)) 3. And "see your local kernel hacker" has been around on my system for about a year, suspend and resume work just fine. Jan 14 06:33:52 kernel: __pm_runtime_resume not implemented -- see your local kernel hacker Jan 14 06:33:52 kernel: pm_runtime_mark_last_busy not implemented -- see your local kernel hacker Jan 14 06:33:52 kernel: __pm_runtime_suspend not implemented -- see your local kernel hacker Jan 14 06:33:52 kernel: __pm_runtime_resume not implemented -- see your local kernel hacker Jan 14 06:33:52 kernel: pm_runtime_mark_last_busy not implemented -- see your local kernel hacker Jan 14 06:33:52 kernel: __pm_runtime_suspend not implemented -- see your local kernel hacker 4. Then 'Giant locked and may be deleted': Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: WARNING: Device "kbd" is Giant locked and may be deleted before FreeBSD 13.0. Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: WARNING: Device "psm" is Giant locked and may be deleted before FreeBSD 13.0. Jan 14 06:33:50 kernel: WARNING: Device "fb" is Giant locked and may be deleted before FreeBSD 13.0. I am guessing number 4 has to do with recent changes, and shouldn't really affect the system if the devices are deleted? Is there a way I can test if its deletion would leave the system unusable? Thank you, -- EvilhamReceived on Tue Jan 14 2020 - 05:35:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:22 UTC