Re: 13.0-CURRENT r356767 wanted ZFS

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 10:30 am, Yuri Pankov <yp_at_xvoid.org> wrote:

> David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:18:41AM +0000, Clay Daniels wrote:
> >> 13.0-CURRENT r356767 would not take NO for an answer, and kept up a loop
> >> until I gave up trying to use UFS. No big deal, seems to work fine...
> >>
> >> Clay
> >> ....
> >
> > Err...?  Is there some additional context that I'm missing?
> >
> > I've been tracking head daily for ... longer than I really want to
> > think about, including on at least one system that has no ZFS file
> > systems; the last couple of smoke-tests were at:
> >
> > FreeBSD g1-53.catwhisker.org 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #7
> r356758M/356758: Wed Jan 15 03:49:49 PST 2020     root_at_g1-53.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY
> amd64 1300076 1300076
> >
> > and
> >
> > FreeBSD g1-53.catwhisker.org 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #8
> r356786M/356787: Thu Jan 16 03:56:45 PST 2020     root_at_g1-53.catwhisker.org:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/CANARY
> amd64 1300076 1300076
> >
> > It is not clear to me at what point anything might have a chance
> > to indicate that it "wanted ZFS" and request an action.
>
> Likely it's about the latest 13.0-CURRENT snapshot image (r356767) and
> the change to bsdinstall to make ZFS default partitioning scheme, now
> discussed on arch_at_.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"


It does seem like this could be related to my commit (see below). Although
I runtime tested installs with both ZFS and UFS options, so I’m surprised.

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356758

I’ll try to have a look at it tonight.

Regards,
Ben

> --

--
From: Benjamin Woods
woodsb02_at_gmail.com