Re: 13.0-CURRENT r356767 wanted ZFS

From: Ben Woods <woodsb02_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 23:33:04 +1000
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 17:24, Ben Woods <woodsb02_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:18:41AM +0000, Clay Daniels wrote:
>
>> >> 13.0-CURRENT r356767 would not take NO for an answer, and kept up a
>> loop
>> >> until I gave up trying to use UFS. No big deal, seems to work fine...
>> >>
>> >> Clay
>>
>
> It does seem like this could be related to my commit (see below). Although
> I runtime tested installs with both ZFS and UFS options, so I’m surprised.
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356758
>
> I’ll try to have a look at it tonight.
>
> Regards,
> Ben
>

Hi Clay,

Thanks for reporting this issue. I was able to replicate it using
bsdinstall on the latest snapshot ISO
FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200116-r356767-disc1.iso.

It turns out the commit that introduced the regression was r356740.

I have submitted a fix for review here:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23232

Regards,
Ben

--
From: Benjamin Woods
woodsb02_at_gmail.com
Received on Fri Jan 17 2020 - 12:33:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:22 UTC