Re: 13.0-CURRENT r356767 wanted ZFS

From: Clay Daniels <clay.daniels.jr_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 19:06:33 +0000
Thanks, Ben. I'm fine with ZFS for this week. I got involved with a little
project of my own on this weeks snapshot, and will see what next week
brings.

Clay

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:33 PM Ben Woods <woodsb02_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 17:24, Ben Woods <woodsb02_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 12:18:41AM +0000, Clay Daniels wrote:
>>
>>> >> 13.0-CURRENT r356767 would not take NO for an answer, and kept up a
>>> loop
>>> >> until I gave up trying to use UFS. No big deal, seems to work fine...
>>> >>
>>> >> Clay
>>>
>>
>> It does seem like this could be related to my commit (see below).
>> Although I runtime tested installs with both ZFS and UFS options, so I’m
>> surprised.
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/356758
>>
>> I’ll try to have a look at it tonight.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ben
>>
>
> Hi Clay,
>
> Thanks for reporting this issue. I was able to replicate it using
> bsdinstall on the latest snapshot ISO
> FreeBSD-13.0-CURRENT-amd64-20200116-r356767-disc1.iso.
>
> It turns out the commit that introduced the regression was r356740.
>
> I have submitted a fix for review here:
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D23232
>
> Regards,
> Ben
>
> --
> From: Benjamin Woods
> woodsb02_at_gmail.com
>
Received on Fri Jan 17 2020 - 18:06:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:22 UTC