Re: iflib/bridge kernel panic

On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 2:54 PM Felix Kronlage-Dammers <fkr_at_hazardous.org> wrote:
>
> Alexander Leidinger wrote on 03.10.20 17:37:
>
> > Quoting Kristof Provost <kp_at_freebsd.org> (from Sat, 03 Oct 2020 16:06:43
> > +0200):
>
> >> Okay, let’s abandon that patch. It’s ugly and it doesn’t work.
> >>
> >> Here’s a different approach that I’m much happier with.
> >> https://people.freebsd.org/~kp/0001-bridge-Call-member-interface-ioctl-without-NET_EPOCH.patch
> >>
> >>
> >> It passes the regression tests with WITNESS and INVARIANTS enabled,
> >> and a hack in the epair ioctl() handler to make it sleep (to look a
> >> bit like the Intel ioctl() handler that currently trips up if_bridge).
> > Works for me.
> > No crash, no LOR, promisc-mode stays enabled, jails are reachable.
>
> indeed! I can second that. Works nicely, my machine does not panic
> anymore and machines (bhyve vms) behind the bridge are reachable.

I third that, it works great for me!

-Dustin