On 9/8/20 4:31 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > On 2020-05-02 02:20, Matthew Macy wrote: >> OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD >> has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can be >> integrated downstream. > > So currently all pools created with OpenZFS will use 512 bit > alignment, at least if the underlying storage device uses 512bit > sectors (which most drives tend to do)? > > If this is the case, it feels like a pessimisation. > > Regards The vdev ashift optimizations from FreeBSD were put in OpenZFS before the import into base. That sysctl does work now. -RyanReceived on Wed Sep 09 2020 - 13:55:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:25 UTC