On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:55:14AM -0400, Ryan Moeller wrote: > > On 9/8/20 4:31 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote: > > On 2020-05-02 02:20, Matthew Macy wrote: > >> OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD > >> has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can be > >> integrated downstream. > > > > So currently all pools created with OpenZFS will use 512 bit > > alignment, at least if the underlying storage device uses 512bit > > sectors (which most drives tend to do)? > > > > If this is the case, it feels like a pessimisation. > > > > Regards > > > The vdev ashift optimizations from FreeBSD were put in OpenZFS before > the import into base. That sysctl does work now. Ugly hack w/ geom_noop required again?Received on Wed Sep 09 2020 - 19:40:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:25 UTC