On 9/9/20 5:40 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 11:55:14AM -0400, Ryan Moeller wrote: > >> On 9/8/20 4:31 PM, Niclas Zeising wrote: >>> On 2020-05-02 02:20, Matthew Macy wrote: >>>> OpenZFS doesn't have the same ashift optimization logic that FreeBSD >>>> has. It's something that needs to be resolved before the code can be >>>> integrated downstream. >>> So currently all pools created with OpenZFS will use 512 bit >>> alignment, at least if the underlying storage device uses 512bit >>> sectors (which most drives tend to do)? >>> >>> If this is the case, it feels like a pessimisation. >>> >>> Regards >> >> The vdev ashift optimizations from FreeBSD were put in OpenZFS before >> the import into base. That sysctl does work now. > Ugly hack w/ geom_noop required again? I believe you can do `-o ashift=` with zpool create/add now. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Wed Sep 09 2020 - 19:46:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:25 UTC