Re: CURRENT, usr/src on git, howto "mergemaster"?

From: Marek Zarychta <zarychtam_at_plan-b.pwste.edu.pl>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 20:13:03 +0100
W dniu 04.01.2021 o 19:54, Enji Cooper pisze:
> 
>> On Jan 4, 2021, at 10:49 AM, Marek Zarychta <zarychtam_at_plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> wrote:
> 
> …
> 
>> Terrible idea IMHO, but I am only the weak voice from the userbase.
>>
>> It's like deprecating old, well-worn hammer in the favour of the nail
>> gun. Why not deprecate biff(1), pom(6), nvi(1) etc.?
> 
> Marek,
> 	I’m curious: have you used etcupdate before instead of mergemaster? If so when? If you ran into issues (UX as well as functional): could you please report them on bugs.freebsd.org <http://bugs.freebsd.org/> ?
> 	etcupdate is a less fragile tool that’s broken my systems less when compared with mergemaster.

Dear Enji,

to satisfy your curiosity: Yes, I have tried etcupdate(8) a few times
over years. It works fine, but I don't like the idea of editing
conflicted files.

I won't complain about etcupdate(8), but please leave mergemaster(8)
as is. I believe we need both: solid, fast black boxes driven it auto
mode and fragile tools in the base. mergemaser is rather not a potential
security hole in the system.

With kind regards,

-- 
Marek Zarychta


Received on Mon Jan 04 2021 - 18:13:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:26 UTC