From: Yasuhiro Kimura <yasu_at_utahime.org> Subject: Re: Waiting for bufdaemon Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 08:33:23 +0900 (JST) >> My belief is that this commit helps more users than it hurts. Namely, >> the VMWare and KVM users, which are majority, use fast timecounter, >> comparing to the more niche hypervisors like VirtualBox. >> >> For you, a simple but manual workaround, setting the timecounter to >> ACPI (?) or might be HPET, with a loader tunable, should do it. > > Then please let me know the name of it. From: Michael Gmelin <freebsd_at_grem.de> Subject: Re: Waiting for bufdaemon Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 00:56:43 +0100 > see `man 4 timecounters': > > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=timecounters From: Mark Millard via freebsd-current <freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Waiting for bufdaemon Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 17:35:14 -0800 > Its somewhat messy but there is a technique of using > the "timecounter" in kib's wording to explore: ... From: Chris <bsd-lists_at_bsdforge.com> Subject: Re: Waiting for bufdaemon Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 18:54:05 -0800 > Not exactly what you're asking for. But sysctl sysctl(3) and loader(8) > will provide some good clues. Thank you for reply. On the system in question 'kern.timecounter.choice' and 'kern.timecounter.hardware' tunables have following values. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- yasu_at_rolling-vm-freebsd1[1002]% sysctl kern.timecounter.choice kern.timecounter.choice: ACPI-fast(900) i8254(0) TSC-low(-100) dummy(-1000000) yasu_at_rolling-vm-freebsd1[1003]% sysctl kern.timecounter.hardware kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast yasu_at_rolling-vm-freebsd1[1004]% ---------------------------------------------------------------------- So I tried setting the latter to 'i8254', 'TSC-low' and 'dummy', and checked if the problem disappear. But unfortunately it still happened. On the contrary changing the value from default made thing worse. If it is set to either 'i8254' or 'TSC-low', timeout of bufdaemon also happens when I shutdown the system just after bootstrap is completed. And if it is set to 'dummy', the sytem hung up in the middle of bootstrap. So setting 'kern.timecounter.hardware' tunable doesn't work in my case. Then is there any way to try? --- Yasuhiro KimuraReceived on Sat Mar 06 2021 - 09:01:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:41:27 UTC