Re: Tracking -CURRENT [was Re: URGENT HELP REQUIRED]

From: CARTER Anthony <a.carter_at_cordis.lu>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:27:53 +0200
I am tracking current, I would have presumed that this would be sufficient to 
know what was going on...To be part of CVS-up as well would mean probably 
another 100-200 mails a night that I don't particularly use...

Thanks for the advice, I may look into cvs-up, but I think that current 
(seeing as that is what I am running) would have mentioned this a little 
more. Besides, didn't even know about cvs-up...

Anthony

On Tuesday 29 April 2003 19:27, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2003.04.29 18:17:24 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > John Baldwin wrote:
> > > Might I suggest that you run -stable for a while until you are a bit
> > > more familiar with FreeBSD?  The deprecation of DRM_LINUX was
>
> clearly
>
> > > pointed out on the cvs-all_at_ when it happend, and people tracking
> > > current really should be reading cvs-all_at_.
> >
> > So why does the website say people tracking current should really be
> > reading freebsd-current (and not mention cvs-all)?
>
> Where does it say that ? The handbook mentions both :
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable
> .html#AEN26734
>
> From the above page :
>
> "Join the freebsd-current and the cvs-all lists. This is not just a good
> idea, it is essential."
Received on Wed Apr 30 2003 - 05:27:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:05 UTC