On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Craig Boston wrote: > On Wednesday 10 December 2003 08:50 am, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > One other thing. When you are building wine, can you search its > > sources for ldt_keeper.c or something like that? It may need > > a patch to work with libthr and libkse. You can see similar > > patches for mplayer and libxine which both have an ldt_keeper.c > > with comments saying it is taken from wine. > > Hmm, ok, I'll have to warn you though, the wine source tree is pretty much the > only thing other than gcc that I find more intimidating than libc/threads :) > > Wine doesn't have an ldt_keeper.c file. The only file I could find that > actually calls i386_set_ldt is libs/wine/ldt.c, which seems to be keeping its > own table of which LDTs have been used. Strange -- usually the kernel > complains about processes that don't use allocate them dynamically but wine > doesn't seem to trigger that warning. > > Despite the claims of the mplayer patch, I was unable to find LDT_AUTO_ALLOC > anywhere in the wine sources. The mplayer patch is to make it use LDT_AUTO_ALLOC. The ldt fiddling code (taken from wine) doesn't use LDT_AUTO_ALLOC, so I had to make it use it. See if you can patch wine to use LDT_AUTO_ALLOC; it shouldn't be calling i386_set_ldt() any other way. BTW, you only get the first 10 occurrences of static ldt allocation warnings from the kernel. It stops printing them after 10. > Oh, just for reference, neither of the machines in question are using the > nvidia driver. Good. -- Dan EischenReceived on Wed Dec 10 2003 - 06:56:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:33 UTC