Re: HEADS UP: new KSE signal code

David Leimbach,

Thank you for your reply and explain the reason for me,
I normally won't reply such complain. At that time,
I was very tire and sick, after one week of hardwork and
sleep late at night for KSE signal code, I think nothing
is important than committing the code and let it be tested
widely.

Thank you again,

David Xu

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k_at_mac.com>
To: "David Schultz" <das_at_FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: "David Xu" <davidxu_at_viatech.com.cn>; <current_at_FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: new KSE signal code


> I don't think you understand what I believe he was trying to say.
> 
> Commits to CVS are NOT atomic therefore getting a copy of FBSD in 
> between David's
> start and finish of commits would be broken.
> 
> When he says he is finished.. I bet it will work again.
> 
> Now if we were all using Perforce this would be different as commits 
> are atomic
> I think :). Its free to use for open source projects too but the 
> practicality
> of making everyone learn something new is not necessarily a good idea 
> :).
> 
> Dave
> On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 04:47 AM, David Schultz wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2003, David Xu wrote:
> >> I begin to commit KSE signal code, libkse will
> >> be broken for a while.
> >
> > Umm...if it's known to be broken, then why did you commit it?
> > If you want people to test KSE and report bugs, the version in
> > the tree needs to be of consistently good quality.
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>