On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:29:45PM -0000, Thomas Seck wrote: > * Doug Barton (DougB_at_freebsd.org): > > > I'm completely uninterested in what other OSes do in this regard. We've > > been doing a fairly good job in -current of tightening up the default > > install. I see this as a big step in the wrong direction. > > I can live with a 'NO_KERBEROS' make option. > > Having the kerberos stuff in a separate tarball and de-selectable in > sysinstall is enough to 'satisfy' my needs. I wonder why Kerberos was > always part of the default installation set anyway? With recent changes, Kerberos is no longer separate or de-selectable from sysinstall, unless you also get rid of e.g. openssh. That's part of what we're discussing. Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:06 UTC