* Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org): > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:29:45PM -0000, Thomas Seck wrote: >> I can live with a 'NO_KERBEROS' make option. >> >> Having the kerberos stuff in a separate tarball and de-selectable in >> sysinstall is enough to 'satisfy' my needs. I wonder why Kerberos was >> always part of the default installation set anyway? > > With recent changes, Kerberos is no longer separate or de-selectable > from sysinstall, unless you also get rid of e.g. openssh. That's part > of what we're discussing. So be it, I am not to decide whether this is 'A Good Thing'. And pardon me to have disturbed you 'while you were discussing'. It will not happen again. --ThomasReceived on Mon May 05 2003 - 07:31:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:06 UTC