> Sam Leffler wrote: >>> Could we add PFIL_HOOKS to GENERIC, while we're at it? Please? >> >> >> Eventually this will happen. Almost certainly in time for 5.2. > > It was due for 5.0-RELEASE, it hasn't made it in for 5.1-RELEASE and post > 5.1-R reminders have been ignored on this list as well. This is starting > to become rather ridiculous. Why not just do it? It was not "due for 5.0" or any subsequent release. It was requested by certain developers and I requested that they demonstrate that adding it to the GENERIC system would not noticeably impact non-PFIL_HOOKS users. I intend to convert certain network subsystems to use PFIL_HOOKS instead of their (current) adhoc techniques. This will mean that PFIL_HOOKS will be a necessary part of the system and so will be in the GENERIC kernel. SamReceived on Tue Sep 23 2003 - 16:58:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:23 UTC