On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > "Bruce Evans" <bde_at_zeta.org.au> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > > > > anyone interrested to validate and commit this PR ? > > > > I hope not. > > I hope yes since this was not the past agreement. I certainly didn't agree to it, and never would. > <cite "Mike Barcroft"> > In the past versions of this conversation, the general agreement is that > going forward we should probably standardize on underscores to seperate > words. So, NO_FOO rather than NOFOO. However, no_volunteer has come > forward to do the work you've described, so if you're volunteering.... > </cite> It was bad to encourage people to waste time on this. > the purpose of the original thread was to convert "all" variables to one > form or another, not just some of them for some or other reason. > in one word... be consistant, it's help. > it's not my fault if only some "no conforming" variables regarding all > others are used in so many makefiles. For a more modest task, try fixing the English spelling of "nothing" to "no thing" and "consistent" to "consistant". BruceReceived on Fri Apr 16 2004 - 15:20:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:51 UTC