On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:19:58AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > > the purpose of the original thread was to convert "all" variables to one > > form or another, not just some of them for some or other reason. > > in one word... be consistant, it's help. > > it's not my fault if only some "no conforming" variables regarding all > > others are used in so many makefiles. > > For a more modest task, try fixing the English spelling of "nothing" > to "no thing" and "consistent" to "consistant". There's noway that could be considered the same thing. (Disclaimer: I really don't care which way this falls out). Ceri --
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:51 UTC