David Rhodus wrote: >On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:57:19 +0400, Roman Kurakin <rik_at_cronyx.ru> wrote: >> I fully agree with you. But this not affect "open source"ness. >> I'd rather call it open development. >> >> rik > >Yes, it does when the public doesn't have direct access to the >development work going on. Thats what started this thread in the >first place. > >-- > -David > Steven David Rhodus When are you and some of your DragonFly minions going to stop spreading this garbage? If you want to talk about open-source, why don't you divert the attention to the frankly cowardly behavior going on pertaining to parts of the DragonFly source tree instead? Whereas DragonFly has appropriated a significant amount of FreeBSD code, only to ammend the lisencing to its own network code to include the advertising clause (removed officially from the BSDL a while ago now), and for what? Only to make it difficult for FreeBSD to take some of the code back. So if you want to talk about 'shitty open-source practises,' I'd argue that yours are much more significant than ours. -BoskoReceived on Wed Aug 18 2004 - 12:42:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:06 UTC