Re: Review/Test: Pseudo-device unit number management patch

From: Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 00:37:02 -0800 (PST)
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0402072348240.24800-100000_at_InterJet.elischer.org>, Ju
> lian Elischer writes:
> 
> >> I would appreciate if people would test these devices work _as
> >> previously_ with this patch in place.
> >
> >well that depends on your definition of "as previously"
> >
> >Previously, nmdm started off with 4 devices visible in /dev now I don't
> >see that.. The old behaviour was intuitive... You saw a device.
> 
> This new behaviour is called a "cloning device" and it doesn't allocate
> any resources until they are actually needed, which I belive is the
> correct behaviour for pseudo-devices.
 
As I said.. I doesn't behave _as Previously_  which is what you asked..

> 
> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> 
Received on Sat Feb 07 2004 - 23:37:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:42 UTC