On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Andrey Chernov wrote: > Well, it looks like this discussion dies silently. > > To prevent conflicts I want to inform all interested parties that I plan > to do it again, now with binutils libiberty (because I add > getopt_long_only()). I plan to do it in the old way, i.e. removing from > HEAD, unless I'll hear _constructive_ objections, explaining what to do > with orphaned vendor files in the previous releases (in case removing from > VENDOR instead). I suggest someone talk to the TRB or cvs_at_ to get an understanding of our preferred methods of dealing with the cvs tree. I raised an objection because your approach differs from what I think is best to reduce maintenance overhead for future importers but if it fits some larger FreeBSD plan, I have no problems with it. -NateReceived on Thu Feb 26 2004 - 16:38:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:44 UTC