Jonathan Weiss wrote: >>Jonathan Weiss wrote: >> >>>>>OK, I seem to be able to get FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE to reliably panic with >>>>>a "panic: free: address 0xd8d5e000(0xd8d5e000) has not been allocated." on >>>>>the serial console when it crashes. >>>>> >>>>>I'm doing two copies of the entire ports collection to seperate >>>>>subdirectories when the crash occurs. It seems to do this regardless of >>>>> >>>>>The machine is an IBM Netfinity 5500 with 4 x 550Mhz P3 Xeon CPUS, 2gigs >>>>>of ram and a Mylex DAC1100 RAID controller. There are 6 73G disks attached >>>>>to channel 0 of the controller, 5 disks are in a RAID 5 array, the sixth >>>>>is a hot spare. >>>>> >>>>>Any ideas? >>>> >>>>I see the same here with my p2 400 and a Mylex DAC960PL and 5x4,5 GB HDDs. >>>>Installing 5.2.1-RC2 fails with the same panic. >>>>5.1 worked flawlessly. >>>> >>>>Jonathan Weiss >>> >>> >>>Sorry for replying to myself, but I tried a snapshot (28/2/04) and got the >>>same panic. Installing 5.1 is working and until the end of january I also >>>had current without problems on this machine. I am not sure, but I think >>>that i also had 5.2.1-RC1 on this machine without problems, so the problem >>>may be introduced not long ago. >>> >>>Thank you, >>>Jonathan Weiss >>> >> >>Can you try the attached patch? >> >>Scott >> >>Index: mlx.c >>=================================================================== >>RCS file: /usr/ncvs/src/sys/dev/mlx/mlx.c,v >>retrieving revision 1.44 >>diff -u -r1.44 mlx.c >>--- mlx.c 22 Feb 2004 09:52:46 -0000 1.44 >>+++ mlx.c 28 Feb 2004 17:48:59 -0000 >>_at__at_ -1554,8 +1554,8 _at__at_ >> if ((mc->mc_complete == NULL) && (mc != NULL)) >>mlx_releasecmd(mc); >> /* we got an error, and we allocated a result */ >>- if ((error != 0) && (mc->mc_data != NULL)) { >>- free(mc->mc_data, M_DEVBUF); >>+ if ((error != 0) && (result != NULL)) { >>+ free(result, M_DEVBUF); >>mc->mc_data = NULL; >> } >> return(result); >> > > > I tried the patch, but i still get the same panic :-( > > Maybe i did something wrong because it was the first time I built a release. > I cvsupped the cvs-tree to /home/ncvs with the > /usr/share/examples/cvsup/cvs-supfile, apllied your patch to > /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/mlx/mlx.c,v. Then a checked src out from /home/ncvs > to /usr/src and did a buildworld. > > After building the world, I did: > > Cd release > make release CHROOTDIR=/home/mille/release BUILDNAME=5.2-MLX > CVSROOT=/home/ncvs MAKE_ISOS=yes NODOC=yes NO_FLOPPIES=yes NOPORTREADMES=yes > NOPORTS=yes > > I then burned the miniinst.iso from /home/ncvs/release/R/cdrom. > > Were these steps correct? > > Thank you, > Jonathan > > Editing the repo by hand is generally not a good idea ;-) Patches can be inserted into the release build process via the LOCAL_PATCHES variable in /usr/src/release/Makefile. The patchfile needs to be relative to /usr/src, IIRC, so you would have to make a minor change to the patch that I sent out. In any case, you should look in /home/mille/release/usr/src/sys/dev/mlx/mlx.c to see if it contains the changed lines. If so, then I'm rather surprised that the panic still happens in the same place. ScottReceived on Sun Feb 29 2004 - 10:19:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:45 UTC