Re: Rewrite cvsup & portupgrade in C

From: David O'Brien <obrien_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:38:53 -0700
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:23:16AM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 12:00 AM -0700 2004-07-07, David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> > JDP choose M3 because it was a very good language for the job -- C and
> > C++ isn't.  We've gone too far in our snooty opinion that if it ain't
> > C/C++ it is crap.  Modula-3, Ada, and Eiffel are very fine application
> > languages, and CVSup is an _application_.
> 
> 	I'm confused.  Once these applications are in binary form, what 
> difference does it make what language they were written in?

HUGE!  Well maybe not HUGE, but huge.  Languages such as Ada and Modula-3
actually do bounds checking on arrays, for instance.  The safety and
correctness of an application running depends on the language it is
written in.  We should have a LOT less buffer overflows if an application
language were used for web servers, mail servers, and other network
daemons.

> Is cvsup not available as a binary-only package that can be installed?
> Are you required to build it from source, which is why you have to
> install ezm3 as well?

You are not required to build it from source -- Kris Kennaway does an
excellent job doing that for you.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)
Received on Wed Jul 07 2004 - 14:38:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:00 UTC