On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 14:46, Eric Anderson wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > >On Fri, 2004-07-23 at 14:31, Eric Anderson wrote: > > > > > >>Eric Anholt wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>OK, the final version of the X.Org conversion patch has hit the tree. > >>>No ports appear to be broken by the upgrade at this time. X.Org has > >>>been made the default X distribution on -current. Other versions of > >>>FreeBSD retain the same default X distribution (XFree86) but can upgrade > >>>by setting X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg in /etc/make.conf. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>Sorry if I'm in the stone age here, but I why is this better than > >>XFree86? Just curious. > >> > >> > > > >It's newer than our old XFree86 4.3 and supports far more hardware. > >It's also where current X developers are working, so it's where new > >features will be first. It also doesn't have the new XFree86 license. > >You could read xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/CHANGELOG and xc/ChangeLog > >to see what actually changed. (Hint: a lot.) > > > > Cool! So I can expect all the same stuff that works in the -snap > version (4.3.99 I think?) of XFree86 to work on X.Org stuff? In Yes, and more. The snap is quite out of date. -- Eric Anholt eta_at_lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt_at_FreeBSD.orgReceived on Fri Jul 23 2004 - 19:58:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:03 UTC