Hi Paul, P.D. Seniura wrote on Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 11:35:14AM -0600: [..] > > > In fact I've been spotting _many_ commits that I cannot find in the recent > > > archives. For one, the commit that moves the port print/teTeX to > > > print/teTeX-base does not present itself in a search > > > > AFAIK, it has not yet been committed. > > >From my CTM log for June 2: > > ./20040602/ctm_ports.log:234:> DM /ports/print/teTeX-base > ./20040602/ctm_ports.log:235:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/Makefile > ./20040602/ctm_ports.log:236:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/distinfo > ./20040602/ctm_ports.log:237:> DM /ports/print/teTeX-base/files > ./20040602/ctm_ports.log:238:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/files/listings.sty > ./20040602/ctm_ports.log:239:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/files/pkg-install.in > ./20040602/ctm_ports.log:240:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/pkg-descr > ./20040602/ctm_ports.log:241:> FM /ports/print/teTeX-base/pkg-plist > > > I just can't find the cvs commit entry on cvs-ports_at_ > to see what's going on. And Nothing Much Relevent on > ports_at_. [..] As it appears to me, this was neither "move" nor "commit", because "print/teTeX" does still exist in the tree (and btw does work with portinstall, instead of teTeX-base, which did not work, yet, but I did not investigate much further). I bet my tonight pizza, this was a "repo-copy". A part of the CVS Repository was directly copied. Since this is an operation opaque to CVS itself, there cannot be a commit-message or log. Since a repo-copy can only be performed by the few CVS meisters, I guess some of them could give a more qualified comment to this particular case. Cheers, Daniel -- IRCnet: Mr-Spock - "Do you love yourself ?" - "Yes!" (Isar 12) - Daniel Lang * dl_at_leo.org * +49 89 289 18532 * http://www.leo.org/~dl/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:56 UTC