On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday 14 June 2004 07:57 pm, Nate Lawson wrote: > > I think I know my problem. I was testing using modules and so I had the > > latest changes to acpi.ko (which now don't init the table to NULL) but no > > changes to the kernel (checking for the acpi devclass). > > > > Sorry, this looks like pilot error. I'll test the change of just using > > devclass_find() instead of also device_get_softc() and commit. > > devclass_find() will succeed even if acpi0 fails to probe. The softc is only > null if the device is attached I suppose, so even if you do > devclass_get_device() you have to check to see if the device_t's state is > > DS_NOTPRESENT. device_get_softc() manages to do that for you in one check > since a DS_NOTPRESENT device has a NULL softc (as does a non-existent > device). Ack! Please back out my commit. Dealing with a hard drive crash here so can't commit right now. -NateReceived on Wed Jun 16 2004 - 03:19:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:57 UTC