On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 01:37:44AM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote: > On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 19:02, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > Thanks! So, could you try the patch below? I think it is now > > basically identical with what you posted, except for the changes to > > nss_compat.c. > > After making a bone-head mistake and just installing the libc after a > make update (duh!) I finally managed to salvage my system and give the > patch a go. Things look good. Thanks! I'll commit it. > I'm still concerned that nss_atexit can cause a seg11 if a nss_*.so.1 > starts up any threads when the program isn't threaded otherwise. Don't > really know why an nss plugin would want to do that, but it is > hazardous. The locks may not be needed regardless. Dan, how do threads interact with atexit()? Are threads serialized at that point? Does the main thread call all the atexit handlers? Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar_at_celabo.org / jvidrine_at_verio.net / nectar_at_freebsd.orgReceived on Tue Mar 30 2004 - 05:42:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:49 UTC