At 5:12 PM +0200 2004/05/05, Søren Schmidt wrote: > These patches are not really combineable since I've done things > differently and IMHO the way ATA wants it. What I would find usefull > would be the code to handle the AMI? RAID type as I havn't got any > HW with that one handy to test on, but if thats not to be unless the > patch at hand goes in, well... > > BTW doug's patches doesn't solve the missing interrupt problem > unless I've missed it in the patch. I think the point was that Doug tried to follow your style, and you feel that he failed to do so resulting in patches that can't be combined with your work. Your reaction to Doug and the way you have treated him are very discouraging, thus helping to ensure that he does not make any further attempts to help you on this subject. If you could be more constructive in your criticism of Doug and help him to better understand what it is you're looking for in the way of style, then he'd be in a better position to help you fix certain things and give you more time to work in other areas where he is not. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.Received on Wed May 05 2004 - 06:53:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:53 UTC