Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?

Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Thursday 14 October 2004 12:59, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:51:41PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
>> [ ...well made userland point snipped... ]
>> Unfortunately, due to the way ata and atapicam are implemented right now,
>> this is unlikely to happen soon.
> 
> Easy workaround: Put atapicam into GENERIC. I'm waiting for that to happen 
> ever since atapicam entered the tree.

I'd strongly agree, unless there is a major downside to doing so.

(Disclaimer: Having ATAPICAM in GENERIC would reduce my email support burden 
for the dvd+rw-tools port by a noticable fraction.  :-)

-- 
-Chuck