Re: atapicam(4) as KLD?

From: Søren Schmidt <sos_at_DeepCore.dk>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:57:42 +0200
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> 
>> On Thursday 14 October 2004 12:59, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:51:41PM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
>>> [ ...well made userland point snipped... ]
>>> Unfortunately, due to the way ata and atapicam are implemented right 
>>> now,
>>> this is unlikely to happen soon.
>>
>>
>> Easy workaround: Put atapicam into GENERIC. I'm waiting for that to 
>> happen ever since atapicam entered the tree.
> 
> 
> I'd strongly agree, unless there is a major downside to doing so.
> 
> (Disclaimer: Having ATAPICAM in GENERIC would reduce my email support 
> burden for the dvd+rw-tools port by a noticable fraction.  :-)

But will do the opposite to my mailbox, and I *dont* support atapicam, 
so I think its a bad idea, besides I waste enough time as is, thanks...


-- 

-Søren
Received on Thu Oct 14 2004 - 17:58:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:17 UTC