On Thursday 14 October 2004 22:31, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 11:27:15AM -0700, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > > similar others, nothing brings special attention to be aware of. I'll > > > expect special 'WARNING: de owners' message to current in such > > > situations, i.e. if something is not fixed to work together. > > > > I think your expectations of support are unrealistic here. > > FreeBSD is a largely unfunded volunteer open source project. > > de(4) has no official maintainer(s). Patches are welcome. > > > > On the other hand, if you want a commercial level of support, consider > > paying for it. > > All this suggestions really surprise me. Patches? Pay? Another one was to > buy different card, from somebody other... > > I know myself well how to _handle_ it now, please don't try to suggest. My > problem was that REASON of hang was UNCLEAR for me for two months. > > People, I not expecting that you'll fix this if_de and not even demand it > in any form! If you actually read what I write I expect only 'WARNING' > mail to current_at_ list in case some dangerous commits made. What is > unrealistic in this expecation? Such as: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-current/2004-March/024239.html http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-current/2004-July/031839.html ... Anyway, let's end this and get on to fixing it - shall we? Could reporters please try to backout the ALTQ patches: http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/if_de.c.backout.diff or check if reducing the driver managed queue length allready helps: http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/if_de.c.drvlen.diff Please tell me if it helps. TIA. -- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier_at_freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier_at_EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:17 UTC