>>> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 10:26:49AM -0700, Zoltan Frombach wrote: >> Yes. Wouldn't it be a nice feature for "portupgrade -P" to install >> the port instead of the package if any non-defaults were defined in >> pkgtools.conf? >> (I guess now's the time for me to learn some ruby) > If you really want to add this to portupgrade, it should be optional, > though. Because someone might have a broken compiler or something and > just wants to install a binary package quickly. In that case it > should be possible to force a binary package installation regardless > of what's inside the pkgtools.conf file. Don't you agree? This is already in portupgrade. :) "portupgrade -PP" will force it to install a package only. If there is no package availble, then nothing gets installed. -- Freddie Cash, CCNT CCLP Helpdesk / Network Support Tech. School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357] fcash_at_sd73.bc.ca helpdesk_at_sd73.bc.caReceived on Wed Oct 27 2004 - 18:58:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:19 UTC